Throughout season five, Prince Phillip is often seen with Penny Knatchbull, the wife of his godson and nephew, Norton Knatchbull, but how much of their onscreen relationship is real? Turns out, just about all of it. Meanwhile, one-half of the alleged conversation, former PM John Major, called the depiction "a barrel-load of nonsense" and, in a statement issued to CNN, said, "There was never any discussion between Sir John and the then Prince of Wales about any possible abdication of the late Queen Elizabeth II - nor was such an improbable and improper subject ever raised by the then Prince of Wales (or Sir John)." This is not strictly accurate: the discussion was actually held with a previous prime minister," Jephson explained. "We later see Charles discussing the poll and possible regency with the prime minister. Patrick Jephson, Princess Diana's former press secretary, wrote in The Telegraph that the Prince did have a conversation, but not with Major. The Prince, always strong in his opinions about modernizing the monarchy, is shown to welcome the idea of the Queen's abdication, so much so that he has a conversation with Prime Minister John Major to discuss the public's swaying opinions, but did this really happen? In the episode, Prince Charles gets a stroke of confidence after a Sunday Times poll reveals that a majority of citizens view the Queen as out of touch with the modern world and archaic in values, thus putting pressure on her to abdicate the throne. With endless buzz around the series and viewers taking to Google in search of all the facts, here's what's accurate and what's not accurate about Britain's most famous family in "The Crown" season five.Ī constant theme of the season's premiere episode, " Queen Victoria Syndrome," is the conflicting views of sovereign leadership between Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Charles. Series five is a fictional dramatization, imagining what could have happened behind closed doors during a significant decade for the Royal Family - one that has already been scrutinized and well documented by journalists, biographers, and historians," the spokesperson said. "'The Crown' has always been presented as a drama based on historical events. 9, a spokesperson for Netflix issued a statement to Variety to address the fictionalized content of the series. Just weeks before the season-five premiere on Nov. Notably, "The Crown" depicts a handful of significant events from the era, including King Charles and Princess Diana's very public, turbulent divorce.Īpart from the historical events, the show also takes creative liberties to amp up the onscreen drama between characters, which has caused many to question its accuracy, and many to urge the show's creators to clarify that the series is not entirely based on fact. Historically, the time period is categorized by divorces, love affairs, scandals, unrelenting press scrutiny, and an economic recession. The highly anticipated season five of the series shifts from the rocky beginnings of Prince Charles and Princess Diana's marriage, which played out toward the end of season four, to the dissolution of said marriage through one of the royals's most tumultuous decades: the 1990s. Netflix's critically acclaimed series " The Crown" takes viewers on a journey with the British royal family during the incredible 70-year reign of Queen Elizabeth II, and highlights some of the monarch's highs and lows over the years, ranging from her marriage to Prince Philip to working with a handful of notable prime ministers like Winston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |